While comparing the World State Citizens and the Reservation Citizens I understood that the WSC use soma to become happy and to have a perfect life whereas the RC (the people that are like our people today) are completely happy with making mistakes and and imperfection. With the citizens of World State the main idea is to have sex with whoever you want as much as you want in order to be happy and perfect. On the other hand the Reservation Citizens use sex to create another life and to raise it to be it's best while making mistakes and being imperfect. 

Bernard with the World State tries to make people perfect and fit in because he was never like that and he wants them to become what he never was able to be. Bernard hate all sin and hate therefor he is always trying to eliminate it from the World State world.

John with the Reservation Citizens believe that everyone's equal because he wants them to be treated the way he never was with respect. John is very religious and has been denied by many societies and never fit in, he was an outsider who criticizes the World State and looks down on them. 

This all relates to my big question "How can we use teamwork to make the job easier" because both societies have worked together to form a government and one belief. Both World State and Reservation use teamwork to form an opinion on others and to make the people fit into their type of society. 

      In The Obsolute Man the people of the jury come together  to make an accurate verdict saying whether or not the librarian should've been found guilty. 

The three people of the jury that gave the verdict of the librarian didn't have the opportunity to give their opinions on him they just knew that if they didn't say he was "obsolete" that the judge wouldn't stand for it and would've over ruled their decision anyways. 

The old librarian and the people of the jury worked together and used teamwork to find the judge obsolete also. I thought personally that while they were working together they found the verdict quicker and easier!

I believe that people using the technology we have now and  the opportunities to spread information and ideas has caused a lot of problems in the world for us today! The spread of these ideas has made people angry depending on what is being said and has made people want to rebel and come forth with their opinions which may not always be someone else's opinion.

Not only has this caused negativity and problems but the spread of ideas by the use of technology has also helped us in good ways. Sometimes the ideas that people are spreading have had an influence on others positively and has helped them realize the good in things. 

This video has helped me understand the positive and negative sides of the use of technology and how fast it helps ideas spread. We need more people in this world to stand up for what they believe and to not be so worried of the outcome and just put their thoughts out there. 

Why would the president take on the initiative to change any law that the congress may have passed even though he had so much help? Did he think that he could make it any better? My thought on this is that when you have so much help and so many people around to help you make the right decisions then why would you even question that they may be wrong or try to change what they feel is right? More people than ever try to be too independent with their decision making and don't even consider what others may be thinking. 

People would like to believe that the government is going to be fair to everyone and make their lives easier in the long run, but is the government really doing it to make our lives easier or theirs? While reading the "slip of the pen" by Walter Dellinger the American Bar Association was tearing down the government and how they create a signing statement. The ABA is stating that a lot of presidential signing statements are unconstitutional.